73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Nexen N1000 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
68
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N1000 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 78 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N1000 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 40 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 67 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU1 | N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 66 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU1 | Nexen N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 68 |
| Dry | 78 | 78 |
| Wet | 81 | 66 |
| Snow | 76 | – |
| Comfort | 56 | 63 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 67 |
| Handling | 75 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
68
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
The Nexen N1000 is a polarizing budget-tier tire that divides opinion between those who value its longevity and value-for-money, and those who find its performance and refinement lacking. While some users report excellent durability and reliable dry-weather handling, others cite significant issues with road noise, wet-weather traction, and structural integrity.
Pros
- High tread longevity and durability
- Competitive price point
- Predictable and stable dry-weather grip
- Comfortable ride quality for daily commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise levels
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
- Lack of steering feedback
- Reports of premature flat-spotting and structural sidewall issues
Observations
- Users with higher-horsepower vehicles (150bhp+) reported difficulty putting power down effectively in dry conditions.
- Drivers of mid-sized sedans like the Volvo S60 reported high satisfaction with long-term mileage and motorway performance.
- Some users noted that noise levels tend to increase noticeably as the tread depth wears down.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU1 | B · Nexen N1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 58 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 25,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Nexen
68
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N1000 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 81 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 75 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N1000 scores 63 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 72 vs 67 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire B · Nexen N1000
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU1 also compared with
Nexen N1000 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.