Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Vredestein Snowtrac 5 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

Premium Touring Winter tire

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
85/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
88/100
29 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
84
Snow
89
Comfort
85
Noise
50
Treadwear
87
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Vredestein

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Winter Premium Touring tires

Vredestein Snowtrac 5 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
82
Snow
86
Comfort
85
Noise
72
Treadwear
80
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 and Vredestein Snowtrac 5 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is stronger on treadwear, handling and snow. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 is stronger on noise and dry.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Snowtrac 5 leads by 3
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
84
B — Vredestein Snowtrac 5
87
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 89
Tyre Reviews owners 85 85
Dry Braking (% of best) 98% 94%
Dry Handling (% of best) 98% 99%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force Winter 2 leads by 2
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
84
B — Vredestein Snowtrac 5
82
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 79
Tyre Reviews owners 89 87
Wet Braking (% of best) 91% 90%
Wet Handling (% of best) 96% 97%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force Winter 2 leads by 3
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
89
B — Vredestein Snowtrac 5
86
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 83
Tyre Reviews owners 94 90
Snow Braking (% of best) 99% 97%
Snow Handling (% of best) 100% 98%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
85
B — Vredestein Snowtrac 5
85
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 92 85

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Snowtrac 5 leads by 22
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
50
B — Vredestein Snowtrac 5
72
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
Professional tests (TWG score) 50 72

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force Winter 2 leads by 7
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
87
B — Vredestein Snowtrac 5
80
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
Tyre Reviews owners 87 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force Winter 2 leads by 5
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
85
B — Vredestein Snowtrac 5
80
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Winter 2Snowtrac 5
Tyre Reviews owners 85 80

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Vredestein Snowtrac 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2Vredestein Snowtrac 5
Relative Score 81 82
Dry 84 87
Wet 84 82
Snow 89 86
Comfort 85 85
Noise 50 72
Treadwear 87 80
Handling 85 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 98% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test 94% #2/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test +4.2 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test 99% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test -1 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 85% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test 83% #9/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +2.2 Different tests
Noise Other 91% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test 99% #16/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test -7.5 Different tests
Price Other 95% #18/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 84% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +10.8 Different tests
Value Other 74% #14/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 81% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test -6.8 Different tests
Wear Other 81% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test 46% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +34.8 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 14% #7/49 · 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview 6% #18/51 · 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout +8.7 Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 99% #6/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 97% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +2.2 Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #1/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 98% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +2.1 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 100% #1/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 90% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +10.1 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #14/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 0% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 91% #11/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview 90% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +1 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 96% #10/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 97% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test -1.2 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in severe snow and ice conditions. While users consistently praise its traction in challenging weather and its competitive pricing, some note a lack of steering feedback and reduced performance during spirited dry-road driving.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
  • Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Generally low tread wear and good longevity for most drivers

Cons

  • Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
  • Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
  • Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
  • Potential for premature tread degradation under aggressive or sporty driving styles

Observations

  • Drivers of heavy vehicles and those towing trailers reported high stability and confidence in deep snow and arctic conditions.
  • Users with electric power steering systems noted a lack of road feel, which can lead to understeer in front-wheel-drive vehicles with heavy front ends.
Tire B Vredestein Snowtrac 5

The Vredestein Snowtrac 5 is highly regarded for its exceptional traction in winter conditions, particularly on snow and ice. Users consistently praise its wet-weather performance and low noise levels, positioning it as a reliable and cost-effective choice for various vehicle types.

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and handling in deep snow and on icy surfaces
  • Strong performance and stability in wet road conditions
  • Low road noise levels across various surface types
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Limited long-term data regarding tread wear longevity
  • Perceived as expensive by some users depending on the specific vehicle application
  • Inconsistent availability compared to major market leaders

Observations

  • Lightweight vehicles, such as the Smart Fortwo, benefit significantly from the tire's responsive handling and snow-clearing capabilities.
  • Small commercial vehicles like the Peugeot Partner report high satisfaction regarding noise comfort and wet-weather safety.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 B · Vredestein Snowtrac 5
CategoryPremium Touring Winter tireWinter Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Vredestein

Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 and Vredestein Snowtrac 5 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is stronger on treadwear, handling and snow. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 is stronger on noise and dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Vredestein Snowtrac 5 scores 72 vs 50 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 87 vs 80 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 80 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 86 on snow.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · Vredestein Snowtrac 5

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.