71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
15 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
53 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Toyo Proxes Sport vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
66/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
253 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Toyo Proxes Sport and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 are within 2 points overall. Toyo Proxes Sport is stronger on comfort, noise and wet. Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is stronger on handling, dry and treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Proxes Sport | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | 90 |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | 88 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 94% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Proxes Sport leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Proxes Sport | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | 71 |
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | 79 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 88% | 87% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 97% | 95% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Proxes Sport | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 48 | 47 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Proxes Sport leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Proxes Sport | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 43 | 2 |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | 84 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Proxes Sport leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Proxes Sport | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | 34 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | 83 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Proxes Sport | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 72 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Proxes Sport | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes Sport | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 76 | 89 |
| Wet | 79 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 56 | 34 |
| Noise | 70 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 78 |
| Handling | 65 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #8/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 97% #6/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.6 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 94% #8/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -4.5 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #11/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +17.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 95% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4.8 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 67% #4/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 79% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -11.8 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 99% #17/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +5.5 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 53% #17/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -13.2 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 8% #13/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 7% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.5 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +5.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 60% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4.4 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #19/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 88% #7/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | +1.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #5/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +2.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Toyo Proxes Sport is a polarizing budget-oriented performance tire that offers strong value for daily driving but receives mixed feedback regarding its consistency. While many users praise its dry grip and comfort levels, a significant portion of owners report rapid tread wear and unpredictable performance in wet conditions, particularly on high-performance vehicles.
Pros
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium performance tires
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Predictable and progressive handling in dry conditions
- Good initial wet-weather traction for moderate driving
Cons
- Rapid and inconsistent tread wear
- Unpredictable traction in wet conditions, with reports of sudden loss of grip
- Soft sidewall construction leading to vague steering feedback for spirited driving
- Increased noise levels reported by some users after initial break-in
Observations
- High-horsepower or rear-wheel-drive performance vehicles often experience significant traction loss and rapid wear.
- Users on daily-driven commuter vehicles report higher satisfaction with comfort and noise levels compared to those on dedicated sports cars.
- The tire's performance is highly sensitive to vehicle alignment, with soft compounds prone to premature wear if suspension settings are not optimal.
The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
- Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
- Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
- Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
- Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
- Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
- Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
- Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
- Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Toyo Proxes Sport
Community opinion on the Toyo Proxes Sport line (including Sport 2 and A/S variants) is largely positive, praised for great value, quiet ride, and solid performance. However, some users note a lack of long-term reviews for newer iterations like the Sport 2, and others seek specific fitment details like load ratings and efficiency impacts.
r/TyreReviews
·17 upvotes ·2026-08-27
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money. Read more”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-08-09
“I have real world experience with the Toyo Proxes Sport AS+. This may be the best all around tire on the planet IMO. I'm old and so I've tried multiple tires in real world conditions as a daily driver with performance in mind. I know every Michelin and Pirelli. I've become an expert on available tires in the USA.. What you will find with This tire: * They are immediately quiet *Resist hydroplaning in big water * Higher than expected dry performance in super hot weather for an AS * Maintain tread pattern to the death and remain quiet. These tires are next level.”
Top themes
#Value for money#Dry and wet performance#Noise levels and comfort#All-season vs summer options#Limited early reviews#Load rating and sizing
Based on 12 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin
Based on 20 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes Sport | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 37 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9.3/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 A A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 25,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Toyo
70
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Toyo Proxes Sport and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 are within 2 points overall. Toyo Proxes Sport is stronger on comfort, noise and wet. Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is stronger on handling, dry and treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo Proxes Sport scores 56 vs 34 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Toyo Proxes Sport scores 70 vs 52 on noise.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 81 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 89 vs 76 on dry.
Tire A · Toyo Proxes Sport
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
More comparisons
Also compared with
Toyo Proxes Sport also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.