76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better snow, noise and treadwear. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV if comfort, dry and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 79 |
| Dry | 91 | 77 |
| Wet | 84 | 81 |
| Snow | 41 | 80 |
| Comfort | 89 | 65 |
| Noise | 80 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 77 |
| Handling | 84 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering superior grip and a quiet, comfortable ride. While many users praise its performance characteristics, there is a significant divide regarding tread longevity, with some owners reporting rapid wear and premature rubber chipping on heavier SUV models.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Low road noise levels
- Precise handling and cornering stability
- High level of ride comfort
Cons
- Rapid tread wear on heavier vehicles
- Reports of rubber chipping or flaking on edges
- High price point relative to longevity
- Inconsistent durability across different driving conditions
Observations
- Owners of heavy SUVs like the VW Touareg and Mercedes ML report high satisfaction with grip but express concerns regarding the tire's ability to handle the vehicle's weight over time.
- Some users noted that the tire significantly improves handling dynamics compared to factory-fitted alternatives.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
- Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
- Predictable handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
- Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
- Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Goodyear
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better snow, noise and treadwear. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV if comfort, dry and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 80 vs 41 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV scores 89 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV scores 91 vs 77 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 92 vs 80 on noise.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.