70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Turanza ER33 vs Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Turanza ER33 — better treadwear. Pick the Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV if wet, comfort and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 SUV leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER33 | Premium Contact 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 SUV leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER33 | Premium Contact 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 SUV leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER33 | Premium Contact 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 68 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER33 leads by 41
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER33 | Premium Contact 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 51 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 48 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 SUV leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER33 | Premium Contact 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER33 | Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 65 |
| Dry | 75 | 82 |
| Wet | 59 | 72 |
| Comfort | 58 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 88 | 47 |
| Handling | 62 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Tire A
65
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza ER33 is widely recognized as a highly durable, long-lasting touring tire that excels in dry conditions but frequently underperforms in wet weather and comfort metrics. While many users appreciate its longevity and robust construction, the consensus points to significant issues regarding excessive road noise and inconsistent wet-weather traction.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Reliable dry-weather grip and handling
- Stiff sidewall construction
- Consistent performance for daily commuting
Cons
- High levels of cabin and road noise
- Poor wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Mediocre ride comfort and impact absorption
- Unpredictable handling in cold or wet conditions
Observations
- Users on compact vehicles like the Mazda 3 report generally higher satisfaction with handling, whereas owners of premium vehicles like the Lexus IS350 often find the tire's noise and lack of refinement disappointing for the vehicle class.
- Drivers of MPVs and heavier vehicles appreciate the tire's ability to handle load and road abuse, though they note a significant trade-off in ride harshness.
The Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV receives a mixed reception, with users praising its reliable dry and wet braking performance while expressing significant concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels. While initial impressions often highlight comfort and grip, the tire's performance tends to degrade over time, leading to dissatisfaction among owners regarding value and durability.
Pros
- Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
- Strong handling and confidence in wet weather
- Quiet operation during the initial stages of the tire's life
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and disappointing overall mileage
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Poor traction and handling in snowy or winter conditions
- High rolling resistance impacting fuel efficiency
Observations
- SUV owners, specifically those driving the Hyundai Tucson, reported issues with wheel spin and a lack of handling confidence.
- Multiple users noted that the tires required replacement significantly earlier than expected, with some front-axle sets failing before 20,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER33 | B · Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Bridgestone
65
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER33 — better treadwear. Pick the Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV if wet, comfort and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Turanza ER33 scores 88 vs 47 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV scores 72 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV scores 67 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV scores 82 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER33
Tire B · Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza ER33 also compared with
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.