Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Dunlop

Dunlop SP Sport 270

Summer Premium Touring tires

Dunlop SP Sport 270 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
55/100
21 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
54
Snow
–
Comfort
68
Noise
–
Treadwear
53
Handling
49

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera SU1

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera SU1 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
81
Snow
76
Comfort
56
Noise
87
Treadwear
72
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Dunlop SP Sport 270 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Dunlop SP Sport 270
78
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
78
Why this score
SourceSP Sport 270N Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 75
Tyre Reviews owners 67 82
SimpleTire owners – 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera SU1 leads by 27
A — Dunlop SP Sport 270
54
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
81
Why this score
SourceSP Sport 270N Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 85
Tyre Reviews owners 27 75
SimpleTire owners – 89

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Dunlop SP Sport 270
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
76
Why this score
SourceSP Sport 270N Fera SU1
SimpleTire owners – 78

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) SP Sport 270 leads by 12
A — Dunlop SP Sport 270
68
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
56
Why this score
SourceSP Sport 270N Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 40
Tyre Reviews owners 55 79
SimpleTire owners – 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Dunlop SP Sport 270
–
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
87
Why this score
SourceSP Sport 270N Fera SU1
Professional tests (TWG score) – 85
SimpleTire owners – 91

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera SU1 leads by 19
A — Dunlop SP Sport 270
53
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
72
Why this score
SourceSP Sport 270N Fera SU1
Tyre Reviews owners 35 71
SimpleTire owners – 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU1 leads by 26
A — Dunlop SP Sport 270
49
B — Nexen N Fera SU1
75
Why this score
SourceSP Sport 270N Fera SU1
Tyre Reviews owners 49 75

Scores at a glance

Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Nexen N Fera SU1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 270Nexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 59 73
Dry 78 78
Wet 54 81
Snow – 76
Comfort 68 56
Noise – 87
Treadwear 53 72
Handling 49 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dunlop SP Sport 270

The Dunlop SP Sport 270 receives a polarized reception, often serving as polarizing original equipment (OE) on various luxury and performance vehicles. While some users appreciate its quiet ride and stiff-walled handling characteristics, a significant portion of the user base reports severe safety concerns regarding wet-weather traction and rapid, uneven tread wear.

Pros

  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Stiff sidewall construction provides predictable handling for specific vehicle architectures
  • Solid dry-weather performance and cornering stability
  • Competitive longevity compared to certain ultra-high-performance alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of hydroplaning
  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Inadequate grip for high-horsepower applications
  • Vague steering feedback in certain conditions

Observations

  • Lexus RX450h owners frequently report significant understeer and dangerous handling characteristics in wet conditions.
  • High-performance vehicle owners (e.g., C63s AMG) note that the tire struggles to manage high torque, leading to excessive wheel spin.
  • Users of larger SUVs like the Chevy Captiva report premature tread depletion, often requiring replacement before 30,000 km.
Tire B Nexen N Fera SU1

The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Very low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
  • Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use

Cons

  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
  • Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
  • Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
  • Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 270 B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—58
Rim diameters—16″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop

Nexen

Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Dunlop SP Sport 270 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 81 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 75 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 72 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport 270 scores 68 vs 56 on comfort.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 270
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.